Playing politics with outrage
Friday, February 24th, 2006I’d like to take a moment to stick up for a couple of people that I hate.
First up is holocaust revisionist David Irving. I’m Jewish, but I understand that a nation’s freedom of speech is only as strong as the offensiveness of the speech that it defends. Austria has now sentenced Irving to a 3 year prison term, apparently to prove to critics that they’re no longer glossing over their Nazi past.
Second up is Saddam Hussein. You read right. Everyone knows that the man was an evil, murderous dictator. It’s still not acceptable to lie about him just to forward one’s own political agenda. Donald Rumsfeld published an op-ed piece in the Lebanese Daily Star today claiming that “Saddam Hussein’s mass graves were filled with hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis.”
C’mon, Donald. That claim was debunked back in July of 2004. Couldn’t you have made your point with the actual number of victims? 5,000 human beings murdered is horrific enough.
This lie is particularly despicable coming from the man who, in 1984, was in Baghdad meeting with Hussein’s foreign minister on the day that the UN confirmed Hussein had used mustard gas on Iranian soldiers. Rumsfeld still spent the afternoon restoring normal diplomatic ties between Iraq and the United States.
During the time that Rumsfeld was Reagan’s Middle East envoy, the US sold two fleets of helicopters to Saddam. These were later used to drop poison gas on Kurdish civilians. Rumsfeld had no comment at the time. Now he mentions it whenever he wants to play on our outrage.
Towards the end of the op-ed piece, Rumsfeld makes a statement that isn’t supported by anything else in his article. He says, “We are fighting a war in which the survival of our way of life is at stake.”
Huh? Where are the facts or logic to support that amazing claim? Then he ends with a statement that is at once ironic and nauseating:
“…truth is on our side, and, ultimately, truth wins out.”
Oh, Donald, Donald… I wish you knew what truth was.