When I first heard the news of the killing of Rigoberto Alpizar, the Costa Rican-American who was shot by US air marshals at Miami International Airport this past week, my thoughts immediately turned to Jean Charles de Menezes. Menezes was the Brazilian man shot and killed by London police officers in a subway car on July 22nd of this year.
The day of the shooting, police identified Menezes as a terrorist suspect whom they believed was carrying a bomb and who’d acted suspiciously. Media outlets claimed he’d jumped over an entry barrier, run from police and was wearing a bulky coat suitable for hiding explosives. The police allowed these claims to go uncontested. Undercover agents claimed Menezes advanced towards them even after they identified themselves as police, and that they were forced to shoot him to keep him from detonating the bomb.
As evidence to the contrary mounted, with witnesses providing their own accounts, security footage that disproved at least one official claim and one officer who been involved providing conflicting testimony, officials began to distance themselves from the story that had been repeated worldwide.
By the time the dust settled, every major claim had been proven untrue. Menezes was officially cleared as innocent. Unfortunately, far fewer news outlets relayed this fact than had relayed the initial claims.
A similar thing is happening with the case of Rigoberto Alpizar. The official story is that Alpizar ran erratically up the airplane aisle shouting that he had a bomb. Air marshals ordered him to stop, but he forced his way out of the plane. On the jetway, air marshals ordered him to lie on the ground. Instead, he again claimed to have a bomb and reached into his backpack, leading the marshals to believe he was about to detonate it. To prevent this, they shot him. Shortly thereafter, they searched and detonated his luggage, which proved his innocence.
At least seven witnesses now say that Alpizar didn’t say anything at all as he ran towards the plane’s door; only that, before rising from his seat, he shouted “I have to get off!”. They say that Alpizar’s wife, Anne Buechner, ran after him, shouting to airline employees that he was bipolar and hadn’t taken his medication.
When it became clear that Alpizar was going to exit the plane, his wife turned back to get her own luggage and follow him. Clearly, it wasn’t obvious to her that this had become a life or death situation. One problem was that the air marshals were undercover and at a distance, with one wearing a Hawaiian shirt. Alpizar exited onto the tarmack, and witnesses heard the air marshals shout “Stop!”. This is when air marshals say they ordered Alpizar to lie flat on the ground.
One passenger pointed out to reporters that Alpizar was wearing a fanny pack. “You can’t get on the ground with a fanny pack”, he said. “You have to move it to the side.” This may have been the movement that air marshals misconstrued as an attempt to activate a bomb.
Buechner attempted to run outside to again explain to the air marshals why Alpsizar was behaving strangely, but was stopped by fellow passengers who were concerned for her safety. Just then, 5 or 6 shots were fired, killing Alpizar.
One witness who helped to console her after the shooting says Buechner said her husband had believed there was a bomb on the plane and was trying to get to safety. It’s possible that Alpizar said something about a bomb to the air marshals once he was outside, but that they misinterpreted his meaning. For the record, Alpizar was a 20 year+ US resident who spoke fluent English.
As for why a man who had already been diagnosed as bipolar would stop taking his medication prior to boarding an international flight, the answer may lie in a little reported fact. Alpizar and Buechner had been working as medical missionaries in Quito, Ecuador. Just before catching their plane back to the US, Buechner’s fanny pack was stolen. It’s likely that Alpizar’s medication was in that fanny pack.
In addition to the lack of medication, travel and sleep disruptions can aggravate bipolar disorders, but the resulting behavior is rarely a danger to others. Unfortunately, in this tragedy of errors, a man lost his life.
No-one would claim that the air marshals involved didn’t believe they were protecting the lives of the other passengers. They had little time to decide on a course of action, and all of us are wiser in hindsight. However, it seems clear that their minds were already set on a particular scenario, regardless of a reality that didn’t fit. Why would a terrorist get up, announce themselves and then run to detonate their bomb where it would do the least damage? None of us are served by excessive paranoia and an investigatory system that is anything but transparent.
Witnesses didn’t hear Alpizar say anything
Wife mentions Alpizar was afraid there was a bomb on the plane
Wife’s fanny pack was stolen prior to flight
Experts: Travel, Sleep Disruptions Can Aggravate Bipolar Disorder
None of 7 witnesses MSNBC interviewed heard the word “bombâ€